<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Film Student Resources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filmstudentresources.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filmstudentresources.com</link>
	<description>A place to find the answers to the questions all film students have</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:27:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Cinematographer Manual! by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://filmstudentresources.com/lighting/american-cinematographer-manual/comment-page-1#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmstudentresources.com/?p=390#comment-716</guid>
		<description>I have to agree to disagree.  The ASC manual is very complete. The thing is, it is really only a reference book and it relates almost entirely to shooting film.

I have owned every edition of the ASC manual since 1980 (I&#039;m a professional DP) and the number of times I  have actually looked up something in any one of them could be counted on your fingers.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, it&#039;s great, but it is only a reference book.

For real education, there are some great books out there — Cinematograpy: Theory and Practice by Brown, Cinematography by Malkiwicz and a few others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree to disagree.  The ASC manual is very complete. The thing is, it is really only a reference book and it relates almost entirely to shooting film.</p>
<p>I have owned every edition of the ASC manual since 1980 (I&#8217;m a professional DP) and the number of times I  have actually looked up something in any one of them could be counted on your fingers.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, it&#8217;s great, but it is only a reference book.</p>
<p>For real education, there are some great books out there — Cinematograpy: Theory and Practice by Brown, Cinematography by Malkiwicz and a few others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Picture Locked? Or A Film Is Never Finished, Merely Abandoned by Jon.Lillie</title>
		<link>http://filmstudentresources.com/editing/picture-locked-or-a-film-is-never-finished-nearly-abandoned/comment-page-1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon.Lillie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 03:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmstudentresources.com/?p=85#comment-46</guid>
		<description>fixed, thanks Liz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fixed, thanks Liz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Picture Locked? Or A Film Is Never Finished, Merely Abandoned by Liz</title>
		<link>http://filmstudentresources.com/editing/picture-locked-or-a-film-is-never-finished-nearly-abandoned/comment-page-1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmstudentresources.com/?p=85#comment-45</guid>
		<description>The phrase is &quot;merely abandoned&quot; not &quot;nearly&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phrase is &#8220;merely abandoned&#8221; not &#8220;nearly&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

